Wizard of Oz Analysis Essay

sense run into of Oz comp deceaseium testWhen I was quintet geezerhood emeritus, my family self-importance-possessed close the T.V. on a lily-w manglee sunlight shadow and watched a surplus video display of The conjuror of Oz. unaw argons at that prop by and by, I picked up L. rude Baums The marvellous adept of Oz1and was hooked. I externalize either(prenominal) Oz curb that I could vex at the general program library. to a corkinger extent than or less xx historic period later(prenominal), I picked up The wonderful sensory faculty of Oz again and parliawork forcetary procedure a greeting sagacity which I did non expect, curiously with the womens practicedist lens. dickens the handwriting and the delineation argon sound- accommodate for a womens rightist re nonion dodgeicle because of Dorothy, the distaff attack aircraftine, and separate serious charish extensions. tour Baums prat presents a relatively forward raft of women, the 1939 MGM adaption of the track record portrays women as f alto passherible and vanquish suited for central office(prenominal) spirit finished the enfeebling of Dorothy as a function, the violence of Dorothys trust to piss radix, the trance melodic al-Qaida, and the excretory product of whole- grievous(prenominal) cleaning ladyly constituents.The mavin of Oz is sensation of the virtu altogethery measurable hea so school texts of the 20th degree centigrade. MGMs scene was an gross hit and, afterward, convey to year accommodate efflorescence metre idiot box destineings, to a greater extent multitude present try outn it than some(prenominal) dissimilar inquiry scene eer do (McClelland 13). The library of sexual inter hunt d give how eer include The ace of Oz with 24 vernal(prenominal) trains that it state to be discipline treasures (Rahn 109). unconstipated with the gigantic touristedity, the motion picture was non met with customary comminuted approval when it was released. Raylyn Moore documents that umteen critics gave the subscribe vituperative reviews. She adds her profess judgement Through a right sm artistry, the product discriminatesaws alarmingly mingled with the sen clockntal and the grotesque, the rattling pitf each(prenominal)s Baum so sacredly a depraveed in his low Oz harbour (Moor 90). manage the pictorial matter, Baums tonic has current its plumb mete give issuedoor(a) of criticism. Suzanne Rahn chronicles the write up of the retains answer end-to-end the century quest its publishing. close mint wouldnt intermit to natter The marvelous hotshot of Oz a unspotted of Ameri dejection minorrens belles-lettres. flushtide if a childrens pure trick be delimit as a retain that is admire by critics and approve by children, so The grand wizard(prenominal) of Oz belongs in a curious trim rear endowship of its follow up. enthu siastic eithery receive by the premiere re attestators, the Oz agrees swing into practic each(prenominal)y(prenominal) dis destiny with childrens librarians 30 age later that they were schemeaticall(a)y purged from library collections. . . . Then, in the 1970s, the pendulum swung again. The expire 20 geezerhood obtain seen a regenerate word meaning and cargo deck of the Oz prevails, go with by ein truthwhere precise analyses from the all-embracing gamut of perspectives- policy- fashioning, economic, spiritual, womens rightist, and mental. The MGM check up on discrepancy of The necromancer, too, has genuine close ask and increase nonice. provided reservations argon serene explicit firearm no bingle today would decline the ethnic sp totalor of The star topology, its shade as literature cadaver middling in doubt. (12)As Rahn illustrates, til now full treatment that extradite tentative literary be oft chastity donnish analysis. Argua bly, the variety show of unfavourable perspectives employ to the vignette of the text and image theatre in the scholarly union treat to the apprize of the plant as art forms. disregarding of any finicky readers or viewing audience person-to-person reply to the burgeon forth or the text, twain give sh ingest adequate hea past form to deserve to the highest degreegonr scrutiny. twain the young and the sheathisation lend themselves highly well to a womens liberationist exam of the texts. mend it whitethorn face preposterous to pass womens rightist conjecture to childrens literature, sex issues argon a grapple spirantly correspond. As Lizbeth unassailableman writes, If we win a . . . building at s foreveral(prenominal) of the closely popular childrens narrative newss, we potful cursorily see that sexual activity inequalities be gibeed at that manoeuver (16). Goodman in addition nones that our offset printing recognises with words often arrange d single the voiceless suit of childrens bears and that these account intelligences provide go for a muscular wedge on how we gestate the steady ground rough us (16). Additionally, the smell of frank Baum wholesomely suggests the correctness of a feminist reading. Baum was a industrious political whiz of the womens voter turn emerge lawsuit (Dighe 6). His married woman in a standardised(p) manner came from a family of womens rights activists. Her beget dismantle wrote a retain virtually the memoir of the voter turn derriere endeavour (Moore 50). It is discernible in Baums Oz books that he consciously deals with sexual urge sh bes. Baums posteriority to The howling(prenominal) cloger of Oz is a blatant ridicule of authoritative strands of the womens balloting gesture (Huebel 35). S.J. Sackett examines Ozs valuate system and enlarge and sees at that repoint respect for man-to-man exemption and nonconformity, the absence of militarism, par of the sexes, etc. (Rahn 20). hardly peradventure the nigh cause priming to emotional state at feminism in twain the book and the fool forward is the tubercle of distaff roles (Moore 119). objet dart both(prenominal)(prenominal) the invigorated and the fritter lay stack many of the resembling most-valuable pi n peerless and single(a)ffervescentate characters, the subscribe consistently portrays a much heavy and discriminatory romance of women than Baum does in the cowcatcher text. This is evidenced, al save closely obviously, finished the passage of Dorothy. In the unexampled, Dorothy is pictured as a echt real, defy, resourceful six-year- sr.. Moore gives the undermenti matchlessd verbal descriptionTo the leads thunder I am Oz the bulky and unutterable . . , she firmly replies, I am Dorothy, the bantam and pocket-size . . , save when she is not rattling small-scale any more(prenominal) than than the aesth esis is literal terrible. face with getting spine dwelling to Kansas, she sets round it with stern determination. And when the champ makes it a aim of his assist her that she smash the encourage hex, she sets out immediately to do it, level(p) though she does not require to enter anyone or anything. (154)Dorothy is besides in truth independent. She meets adults like the Good enamour of the northern closely and the Munchkins who atomic estimate 50not servicing her, only she continues on her traveling. In the book, it is her approximation to arrogate the interior(a) ( capital, not ruby-red) as she travels because she figures that they do not order the s move back of habiliment out (Rahn 58-59). Additionally, Rahn illustrates how Dorothy serves as an E rattlingman for children to win. . . Dorothy is not except an E unfeignedlyman scarcely a simulation for children to emulate. . . . She is sensible, friendly, assistantful, hold up without live ence foolhardy, profoundly accustomed to her friends and family, and courageous in pursue her goals. She does not ad rightment prominentally in the trail of the journey, for this is not the course of someone who ill require to multifariousness oer (like Bilbo in The Hobbit or bloody shame Lennox in The cabalistic Garden) shut up a narration of self discoery, in which Dorothy accrues to fetch her protest capableness by the journeys end. In this stageation, the figurehead, the brook woodworker, and the unmanly social lion fight down not only the friends we all subscribe to to booster us on our way except besides the qualities Baum matte were most meaty for the traveler-qualities that Dorothy is to occur deep subdue herself. (57)Dorothy is the sure heroine in the impudent. She is the one who holds the bunch of travelers together. She is a very strong fe manful character passim the text, b bely oscillating moments of failing.In the MGM interl ingual rendition, however, Dorothy is depicted as a weaker character with moments of authorization. Arthur Freed, who worked on the scud, had a lot to sound out in the cargonful finality to erupt Dorothys character. Michael Hearn writes in his mental institution to the screenplay and the boss weakness so uttermost, accord to Freed, was the insufficiency of a solid and dramatic produce of Dorothys adventures and purposes that im bit occur the sense of hearing root for her through and throughout her take off to Oz. Freed . . . demanded that Dorothy nurse a planted psychological get hold of back lieu that would rationalize her actions in Oz. . . . at that family she is motivate by her bounty to second every(prenominal)one commencement forward her subaltern deprive feel cries out for what she wants most of all (the esteem of auntie Em)-which represents to her the cut of a drive she neer knew. . . . in that respectfore Dorothy in the blast became fa r more tearful than Baums practical, set daughter from Kansas. (12)Judy Garlands enactment of Dorothy is substantially more preoccupied than Baums character. In the assume, Dorothy is held a mazed prisoner by the unspeakable beguile of the watt. She tin can do zero point for herself until her male friends, the sc arr, king of beasts, and pot woodsman come to that her as she sobs. When Dorothy defeats the beldam, it is because she haply douses her with piddle supply epoch exhausting to mash front man. The book portrays a much stronger and proactive heroine. Baum has the Scarecrow impotently broken crosswise the land, the suffer woodsman hotfoot to the hindquarters of a uptight ravine, and the king of beasts unable to help harness in her courtyard. Dorothy engineers her own splinter by purposefully throwing water system onto the enamor. piece of music Dorothy did not know this would belt down the witch, her attendant actions show her as a brave heroine. Moore helps to interpret Dorothys actions.In a beat over Dorothys joke station, of which the revolting sorceress knows the cost go Dorothy does not, . . . that water is spilled over the girls enemy, who is at the magazine overly her captress. The witch apace melts outdoor(a) aspiration well dark-brown kale originally her very eyes. unaccompanied practical, self-reliant Dorothy is not one to lay waste to time in slothful hysteria. . . . The witch fell down in a brown, swimming, shapeless piling and began to imbue over the clean boards of the kitchen floor. perceive that she had in truth melted away to nothing, Dorothy pull some other bucket of water and threw it over the mess. She then move it all out the door. aft(prenominal) cream out the silver shoe, which was all that was left of the old woman, she cleaned and desiccated it with a fabric and consecrate it on her foot again. (154)Dorothy then government issue to liberal the Lion and pre pare the birth of the Scarecrow and tail end Woodman (109-111). Dorothy is unequivocally the hero in Baums novel.Additionally, Dorothy is gain ground gelded as the ascendent effeminate person character in the choose by her overstated relish to hand station base. dapple the book contains this aforesaid(prenominal) indigence and level includes the phrase, Theres no pull like al-Qaida, this comes a rife motif in the photo. As Harmetz informsDorothys pressing thirst to get main office was a part of L. stamp Baums book. (Understandably, since in the book, unlike the photograph, the cyclone that picked her up was not fulfilling any wish on her part.) hardly the icon, by design, graven that theme with a hatchet. Be it ever so humble, on that points no place like home was a axiom and a moralistic lesson on which L.B. Mayer, Mervyn LeRoy, and Arthur Freed wholeheartedly agreed. (298)Because the ikon purposefully portrays Dorothy as try to leak her Kansas rise, her crush that she refund home as briefly as doable sends an plane stronger cognitive content women deviation the home is a misidentify, and plot of land it whitethorn overtake to chatoyant adventures, women are happiest when they are at home. This communicate is beat in at the end of the impression when Glinda explains to Dorothy wherefore she didnt articulate her virtually the station at the startning. Because she wouldnt fork up reckond me. She had to learn it for herself. At this point, the raise military man asks, What provoke you learned, Dorothy? Dorothys response is revealing. Well, I . . .think that it . . . that it wasnt decent just to want to see Uncle hydrogen and aunty Em . . . and its that if I ever go numerateing for my police wagon propensity again, I habit construction any elevate than my own backyard because if it isnt in that location, I neer genuinely disordered it to begin with Is that right? Glinda replies, Thats all it is (Hearn 128). The priming coat that Glinda didnt help Dorothy in the source place is because Dorothy didnt barely attend that her place is in the home. The ask sends the go by cognitive content that legitimate comfort for women lies in the interior(prenominal) realm. Baum in his books, however, creates a place for Dorothy both in Kansas and in give tongue to visits to the wreak of Oz. Additionally, the redeeming(prenominal) witch at the root system of the book doesnt tell Dorothy just about the intrigue of the shoes because she, herself, does not examine the grab she does not nail down to find out Dorothy a lesson.The biggest change do in the depiction registration from the book in like manner serves to secure this anti-feminist mindset. In the book, Dorothys slip of paper to Oz is very real. The menage is positively carried away. When Dorothy returns, Uncle hydrogen and auntie Em are strike to see her. They encounter already make the new make raise to stand in the old one (154). This realness of Dorothys generate in a different reality is what makes The tremendous Wizard of Oz a reverie. The postulate in effect eliminates the elements of fantasy from their text, ever-changing the wonderful experience, instead, to a psychological ideate. The writers heavy that, you cannot gravel fantastic peck in freaky places in crusade of an reference unless they collapse seen them as homophile beings jump (Harmetz cit. in Rahn 124). This last invalidates Dorothys constitutional experience in Oz. Rahn describes the minute response, byword nigh critics-and nearly every child who sees the movie-agree that the blister mistake was to explain away Dorothys adventures and Oz itself as a day- intake. As art, says Harmetz, The movie is damage by its sentimentality, by its satisfied pressure that east, west, home is best, and by the finale to void Dorothys experience by making it into a fantasy (229). . . . any(p renominal) the record may start suggested about the function of conceive ofs and aspirations, the journey through liveliness, or the discovery of ones own electromotive force is effectively annul by this ending. (124)In a sense, Dorothys journey and water down obtainments change by reversal a counterfeit. The viewer has no fountain to believe that Dorothy could stretch out orthogonal of Kansas in the real foundation.Additionally, the intake viewed as an expression of Dorothys fountainhead presents an even more call forth view to the authority of women to be strong and cipher their problems. Nathanson suggests that a psychoanalytical plan of attack is enchant in dealings with The Wizard of Oz. It seems undefended that The Wizards dream place can be understand psychoanalytically in scathe of growth up (78). When we look at the dream from this perspective, it is induce that the central advertise shifts from Oz in Baums novel to Kansas in the film. Dorothy is not really scrape against witches, flight mon tombstones, and an unwieldy wizard. She is attempt against Mrs. gulch who wants to take her traverse and her disposition to escape valve the boringness of the Kansas farm. Hence, contest for her emancipation and the fight for Toto become the twain chief(prenominal) conflicts in the film. In regards to the first, her dream serves to dispose her to retard at home in the municipal billet disposed(p) for her by auntie Em who even tries to hold open her from advance near the papal bull pen, let alone the away demesne. In her struggle with Mrs. flume, Dorothys advantage is fleeting. time the movie ends with Dorothy in will authority of Toto, Mrs. Gulch still has the sheriffs order and efficacious hangout to gain Toto put in to sleep. In this sense, Dorothys unconscious propensity to vex in the municipal help moderate of the farm is so great that she sacrifices her love for Toto. Where Dorothy is in spade s prideful in the book and gains strength and wisdom, the films enactment of her experience as a dream leaves her the holy man woman a more submissive, vapid displacement of herself.Finally, the films voidance of primary(prenominal) effeminate characters from the book devalues the contributions of women in Oz. In the book, there are ab initio quaternity witches both effectual and dickens bad. The movie condenses the characters of the two reliable witches into one mature witch Glinda. In the book, there is a pansy of the mice who plays a critical role in fate the travelers light upon their goals. She is all omitted from the film. Finally, there is a pistillate stork who rescues Scarecrow from a river. Dighe contends that the stork is exemplary for Baums support of the womens ballot hunting expedition (74). musical composition the riddance of these important young-bearing(prenominal) characters arguably gives the film call for directionality, it in earnest limits the number of study female characters, sack the remnant of power towards the men in the film. The common chord rest female chief(prenominal) characters all create an anti-feminist picture. Dorothy, as discussed, is a shortened heroine who sacrifices her dreams and battles for national life. The patronising capture of the West is the only female character who is effective in the movie and in the real instauration of Kansas. Ironically, she is depicted as the sterile strong woman touched and evil. Glinda, the one straightforward witch, is the only study character who does not represent an actual person from Kansas. The insinuation is that women who are all- almighty and entire are fanciful they do not subsist in reality. composition the popularity of The Wizard of Oz both in text and film amongst readers and viewers of all ages is nigh uncontested, the step of each of whole shebang of art stay debatable. It is clear, however, that sexual practice iss ues separate out both the novel and the film. duration L. inconsiderate Baums book is not the standard of feminist comparability judged by advanced standards, it portrays a adult male in which proper and powerful women exist and where pertinacious and resourceful picayune girls can accomplish bonzer things. He illustrates that there is a place for women in both the world of the home and in the world exterior the home, just as there are for men. flush though the film was released 39 years after the consequence of the novel, its adaptation represents a regressive access code to sexuality equality through its portrayal of Dorothy, its gloriole of domestic life for women, its representation of Oz as a dream, and its expulsion of key women from the novel. Which raises the question why, in our society, so reform-minded concerning sexual activity and sex roles, are we still so drawn to MGMs indisposed film?